Thomas Wants to Address What ‘Arms’ are Protected by Second Amendme

The question before the courts should be simple: How did people at the time of ratification define “arms”?

“We have never squarely addressed what types of weapons are ‘Arms’ protected by the Second Amendment,” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas noted in his statement on the Court’s July 2 denial of petitions for writs of certiorari in HARREL v. RAOUL, a challenge to the  State of Illinois’ so-called “assault weapons” ban. The procedural sidestepping means the edict will continue to be enforceable, a decision on a right denied will continue to be delayed, and American citizens will continue to be at risk of having their lives destroyed for daring to claim their right to keep and bear arms.

Read More at:  https://www.ammoland.com/2024/07/thomas-wants-to-address-what-arms-are-protected-by-second-amendment/?