NRA-ILA DAILY ALERT FOR 5-9-2019


DAILY ALERT FOR Thursday, May 9, 2019

NRA Continues Backing Supreme Court Challenge to NYC’s Travel Ban
NEWS
NRA Continues Backing Supreme Court Challenge to NYC’s Travel Ban
The main brief in the NRA supported case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association et al v. the City of New York and the New York City Police Department-License Division has officially be filed with the Supreme Court.
TOWNHALL
Why This Rifle Maker Keeps Its Base Of Operations In One Of The Most Anti-Gun Parts Of The Country external site
It’s right there for all to see—and with pride: Henry—Made In America, or Not At All. That’s the mantra of Henry Repeating Arms, a gun manufacturer based out of Bayonne, New Jersey.
South Carolina: Constitutional Carry To Be Heard Again By Subcommittee
LEGAL & LEGISLATION
South Carolina: Constitutional Carry To Be Heard Again By Subcommittee
On May 9th, a subcommittee of the South Carolina state Senate Committee on Judiciary will hold another hearing on Senate Bill 139, the SC Constitutional Carry Act of 2019, to ensure that any law-abiding adult who may legally possess a firearm may carry a handgun for self-defense without first having to go through government red tape.
DELAWARE STATE NEWS
3 gun bills to be heard in Senate committee today external site
A Senate committee is set to hear three highly controversial gun bills this afternoon. The Senate Executive Committee is scheduled to convene at 2:30 today to listen to testimony and vote on legislation that would create a permitting process to buy a firearm, ban “assault weapons” and prohibit magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds.
BREITBART.COM
Shannon Watts Mocks NRA Opposition to Centerfire Rifle Ammo Ban external site
On Tuesday Shannon Watts used Twitter to mock the NRA’s opposition to a ban of centerfire rifle ammunition. Watts is the founder of Michael Bloomberg-funded Moms Demand Action. Her criticism was ubiquitously rooted in the NRA’s opposition to an “armor piercing” ammunition ban. What Watts missed is that the opposition rests, in part, on gun controllers’ ambiguous use of the phrase “armor piercing,” whereby they expanded the term beyond its actual meaning in order to broaden the scope of the ban being sought.