NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS For January 5, 2019


NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1

Gun Controllers Want Credit Card Companies to Monitor and Restrict Lawful Purchases
NEWS
Gun Controllers Want Credit Card Companies to Monitor and Restrict Lawful Purchases
Gun controllers frustrated that their federal agenda has been repeatedly rejected by Americans through their elected representatives are seeking to restrict gun rights by way of the private financial system. The goal is to pressure financial services companies into either not doing business with the firearms industry and gun owners or to comprehensively surveille their lawful activity
Gun Owners Call BS on Restrictive Measures in New Jersey and Canada
NEWS  GUN LAWS
Gun Owners Call BS on Restrictive Measures in New Jersey and Canada
Treating nice people like criminals isn’t likely to enhance respect for the law.That’s a tough lesson anti-gun officials in New Jersey and Canada are learning now that deadlines are past or nearly arrived for certain newly-enacted gun control measures.
Shocker: Focusing on Criminals Yields Public Safety Results
NEWS
Shocker: Focusing on Criminals Yields Public Safety Results
Anti-gun organizations want you to believe that the next law, the next restriction on gun rights, the next burden for law-abiding gun owners will be the game-changer.  Whenever gun control fails – and it always does – the answer is that the effort didn’t go far enough. Researchers grasp for an excuse when they find their preferred gun control laws have no effect on crime.
Researchers Credit Right to Carry Law With Reduction in Chicago Property Crimes
NEWS
Researchers Credit Right to Carry Law With Reduction in Chicago Property Crimes
In July 2013, the Illinois legislature overrode the veto of then-Governor Patrick Quinn to eliminate the state’s status as the last holdout in refusing to issue concealed-carry permits. In moving from “no-issue” to “shall issue,” law-abiding citizens of the Land of Lincoln were finally able to enjoy the Second Amendment rights affirmed in D.C. v. Heller, McDonald v. Chicago, and Moore v. Madigan. Yet, even while benefiting from armed protection at the expense of taxpayers, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel maintained that “gun control is essential,” and that the new concealed carry law would result in an increase in crime.